• Home
  • Releases
  • Blog
  • Design
  • Posters
  • Submission Guidelines
  • About
  • Privacy Policy

Loser City

Multimedia Collective

  • Home
  • Releases
  • Features
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Art
  • Submissions
You are here: Home / Features / In Sarah Nelson’s Daniel, Toxic Masculinity is Vampiric

In Sarah Nelson’s Daniel, Toxic Masculinity is Vampiric

August 29, 2017 By Ben Howard Leave a Comment

Over time the metaphorical meaning of the vampire has diversified, shifting away from its earliest existence as a literary representation of xenophobic beliefs. Whatever cultural fear or anxiety vampires come to represent is dependent on the context of the story and the storyteller’s motivations. Sarah Nelson’s Daniel, a horror webcomic about a young man turned into a vampire, is one of the latest twists on the vampire metaphor. Aside from drinking the blood of strangers, Daniel’s love for his dear Christine turns into a horrific obsession. He uses manipulation and threats of harm to keep her. Vampirism in the context of the story is toxic masculinity, a problem that is terrifying not only in extreme manifestations but prevalent social norms.

Rather than use the modern era to comment on these social norms, though, Nelson sets Daniel in Oak Parkland, Illinois in 1934, but makes the curious decision to feature few cultural references to this decade. The only one I can recall is a mention of “Lights Out,” a radio show dedicated to horror and the supernatural. The culture of 1930s America is mostly a visual aesthetic. Sarah Nelson authentically recreates the fashion, architecture, and technology.

That adherence to a vintage visual aesthetic is likely a big part of why Nelson chooses to make the comic 90% black and white. This color choice has several artistic strong points. One is how it recalls the fact that most visual media in the 1930s was black and white. This includes photographs, film, and cartoon illustrations in magazines and newspapers. Speaking of film, black and white allows Nelson to use techniques of light and shadow similar to that of pre-color cinema, particularly horror. Most notable are the moments a character has a dream or flashback which is visually cued as characters and objects isolated by a black or bright background and shrouded in mist. It’s an eerie, uncanny effect that unsettles the reader.

Subtle unease is the primary type of horror in Daniel. It creeps up on the reader until the scene reaches a shattering climax. Many times, Nelson breaks from the black and white palette to include color. These are at the most violent moments of the comic featuring blood and gore. They are also when the theme of toxic masculinity peaks. Daniel is at his mot violent, abusive, and manipulative. This includes a scene of him forcing Christine on a bed while he drinks from her neck. The way he restrains and taunts her is reminiscent of a sexual assault.*

Choosing color for peak moments of toxicity goes beyond shock value, it symbolically reveals the truth beneath the setting’s black and white morale. During the 1930s, America experienced a massive change in gender roles. Men were having a hard time finding work. As such, many stayed at home with nothing to do. They wouldn’t even contribute to housekeeping because that was seen as women’s work. Women were forced to take the initiative. They found jobs and for the first time ever the power dynamic of who was the breadwinner of the house changed.

Men were not happy about this. They accused women of stealing jobs and being too emotionally frail for working environments. It didn’t help that pop culture narratives reinforced ideals that men should be strong and outgoing. This may have distracted men from blaming the private sector and government who actually failed to provide jobs, not to mention gave them an unhealthy motivation to reclaim their masculinity.

Toxic masculinity can be seen through Daniel and his rival Wayne, both of whom are different types common in pop culture. Wayne is a macho hero. He is strong, sharply dressed, and has a certain suave to him. However, he bullies Daniel and is so obsessed with Christine he flies into a jealous rage over a gift. Daniel fits the common romcom trope of a shy, clumsy but ultimately kind man perfect for marriage. Except Daniel doesn’t put in any effort. He avoids taking his relationship with Christine to the next level.

I would argue that Daniel’s change into a vampire represents how meek, inactive masculinity evolves into psychotic violence as overcompensation. Society may reject him, but he is an extreme manifestation of the masculinity it strives for. The scenes of color, when Daniel is at his most violent, highlight what is underneath traditional masculinity. Behind the black and white facade of morality is something truly evil. Daniel’s fear of mirrors further stretches this point. Toxic masculinity cannot reflect and realize the ghoulish nature of its being.

Stuck in the middle of toxic masculinity is Christine. She suffers most from both ends of it, constantly fighting off Wayne’s aggressive courting and exacerbating her emotions trying to reach out to Daniel. All this while living alone and holding down a job as a secretary. When Daniel turns into a vampire, their relationship becomes abusive.

Christine’s family suffers too. While her sister Francine and brother-in-law Leonard try to convince her something is wrong with Daniel, Francine and her daughter Molly have horrific nightmares of strangulation. Before waking up, they see blurry visions of a man with glowing red eyes. They don’t realize it, but that man is Daniel. Like in real life, domestic violence causes stress for family members as they try to do everything to help but may be powerless if the abuser somehow has an upper hand in the situation.

If this were a story of toxic masculinity where the woman character were just a victim or prop for the man’s story, it would defeat its own purpose. However, Christine is an active agent. A large chunk of the comic involves her; she is the narrator and has the most scenes. It’s a tragic story because Christine deeply loves Daniel and does everything in her power to help him. But she cannot stop vampirism from corrupting his mind. Like someone stuck in such a situation, Christine is drained emotionally and physically. She remains strong, fortunately, and fights back once it’s apparent Daniel is lost.

Christine’s situation is both a negative and positive portrayal of women in the 1930s. These attacks from angry, frustrated men stressed them out but also fueled their resolve to overcome. Christine is a heroine, representing their inner strength to combat toxic masculinity.

Reading Daniel made me realize this toxic masculinity is not exclusive to the setting or its time period. It is very much alive today. Men can be fired for stating their women coworkers are inferior to them, but they will not take responsibility, instead opting to double down on their erroneous beliefs. Online hate groups exacerbate modern misogyny with doxxing and harassment campaigns. It’s not even just openly toxic men but also those that are secretly so, as many self-proclaimed male feminists have been outed as manipulative predators.

The comic also reflected my own potential toxicity. I hate to admit how much I’m like Daniel, meek and often scared of taking action, relying a lot on the emotional support of others. It used to be that I made the emotional support a crutch to not grow up. I feel as though that time of my life was when I became a burden on loved ones. I have improved since then, but reading Daniel was a terrifying reminder that I need to give equally as much as I receive. If not, I’m just another vampire sucking the energy out of the people I care about.

Daniel takes one of the oldest ghouls of horror and gives it a new twist to a relevant issue, one that aims to challenge rather than reinforce social norms. As I continue to search for and read more indie horror comics, I hope they are as intellectually and artistically stimulating.

*Sarah Nelson attaches CONTENT WARNINGS to pages that contain scenes that are possibly triggering.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Features, Reviews Tagged With: comics, Daniel, horror, indie comics, Sarah Nelson, vampires, webcomics

About Ben Howard

Ben Howard is some kind of ghoul living in Florida, even though he hates the sun. Educated in literature, writing, and dark arts, he writes comics and about them to remind people of his existence. You can keep up with his haunts and taunts on Twitter: @ScaryCleve.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

SOCIAL

FacebookInstagramTumblrTwitter

Buy Loser City Apparel

loser city T-shirt

Be a Loser

Sign up for Loser City's mailing list to receive weekly updates about the latest articles, shows, and releases.

TRENDZ

Anatomy of a Page art Austin CBS comedy comics Dark Horse DC DC Comics documentary Fantagraphics Film Fossil Records Games HBO hip-hop horror humor IDW Image Comics Indie indie comics jake muncy manga Marvel Marvel Comics Melissa Benoist Music penny dreadful Pete Toms punk Questionable Comics Review Ryan K Lindsay sci-fi Seattle Showtime Supergirl SXSW Television the CW TV video games Video of the Week ymmv

Top Posts & Pages

  • Codeine Crazy
  • Visual Domination: Angelina Jolie's Sexual Power in Mr and Mrs. Smith
  • Lost in My Mind: I Believe in Unicorns is a Gauzy and Inventive Exploration of Girlhood
  • Faithful to a Fault: Where Amazing Spider-Man 2 Went Wrong with Gwen Stacy
  • Below Her Mouth is Yet Another Disappointing Film About Lesbian Experiences
  • Trophies of Over Indulgence: A Look Inside the World of Gainers
  • The Scream: Remembering Chester Bennington's Voice and Why It Connected with so Many
  • A Chorus of Silence: On the Impossibility of Reporting on Chronic Abusers in Comics
  • Anatomy of a Page: Naoki Urasawa's Pluto
  • Adventures in the Floating World: Detroit Metal City

Follow Loser City

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
Instagram has returned invalid data.

Follow loser_city on the Gram

Loser City is…

Comics, shows, a secret critical network -- we aim to fail big.

Danny Djeljosevic: Co-Founder

Morgan Davis: Co-Founder

Nick Hanover: Glorious Godfrey of LC

David Fairbanks: Creative Writing Editor

Kayleigh Hughes: Film Editor

Julie Muncy: Games Editor

David He: Assisting Consultant*

Contributors: Nate Abernethy, John Bender, AJ Bernardo, CJ Camba, Liam Conlon, Daniel Elkin, David A. French, Rafael Gaitan, Dylan Garsee, Stefanie Gray, Johnson Hagood, Shea Hennum, Zak Kinsella, Austin Lanari, Marissa Louise, Francesca Lyn, Chase Magnett, Justin Martin, Diana Naneva, Claire Napier, Joshua Palmer, James Pound, Mike Prezzato, Lars Russell, David Sackllah, Keith Silva, Nicholas Slayton, Carly Smith, Ray Sonne, Tom Speelman, Mark O. Stack, Dylan Tano, Mason Walker

Art

Why So Angry: Refusing to Forget Stories of Abuse

Poetry: My God, My World

Comic Cinema Club: Sorcerer by Rafael Gaitan and Mike Prezzato

Nonfiction: Progeny in Crisis by Kayleigh Hughes

The Persistence of Synergy: Scenes from the Stock Business Photo Prison Hellscape

More Art

Interviews

Dhani Harrison Plots His Own Path With Solo Debut In///Parallel

Boston Terriers and Desert Vibes: A Conversation with Jay and Sanders Fabares of “The Pale”

Questionable Comics: Becky & Frank and Rachael Stott

More Interviews

Copyright © 2023 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in